![]() |
A project of the |
|
|
|
|
OCM
Says Smithfield Purchase of Farmland Lincoln, NE ~ The Organization For Competitive
Markets (OCM) announced today that it vigorously opposes the Smithfield
Foods, Inc. acquisition of bankrupt Farmland Industries'pork processing
business. On Tuesday, July 15, Smithfield announced it had offered to
buy Farmland's pork processing business as the bankruptcy court disposes
of Farmlandís assets to pay creditors. Smithfield is the nationís
number one pork processor and Farmland is number five on the list. "It is hard to imagine that another meatpacker
acquisition could be allowed with the long history of market power abuse
in the industry. Smithfield has relentlessly plundered the free market
system for livestock in the U.S. forcing independent producers into virtual
serfdom,"said Fred Stokes, OCM president. "OCM has committed
its resources to opposing this acquisition and will work diligently in
that effort." Michael Stumo, OCM's legal counsel says the
organization has reviewed the likely market impacts of Smithfieldís
proposed purchase of Farmland and has concluded that the acquisition should
be halted by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and/or the state attorneys
general because it will be catastrophic for hog producers. Overlapping buying regions of Smithfield and
Farmland pork plants: Smithfield Foods operates plants in Sioux Falls,
SD and Sioux City, IA. Farmland has two plants, one in Crete, NE and one
in Denison, IA. The two companies compete for the same hogs as their procurement
areas, or "draw areas", overlap significantly. Smithfield and
Farmland compete for the same hogs. Thus, such a sale would increase the
buying power of Smithfield tremendously in Nebraska, South Dakota, Iowa
and Minnesota. Manipulating price in the key price setting
region: The Western Cornbelt consisting primarily of Iowa, Minnesota,
South Dakota and Nebraska - is the price setting region for hogs in the
U.S. 87% of all hogs are contracted or packer owned and 13% are deemed
open market. In practice, OCM believes that three to five percent of the
hogs traded set the national price. Ninety percent of the hogs produced
under contract are priced by a formula calculated from open market. The
biggest pork packers - Smithfield, Tyson, Swift, Excel have a far
greater opportunity tremendously to use market power to manipulate price
in a thin, low volume open market, than in a high volume market. Allowing
Smithfield to reduce competition in the national price setting region
will significantly increase Smithfieldís ñ and the remaining
packer's ability to push national prices downward for both open
market bid hogs and for contract hogs. Market power is most harmful for perishable
commodities such as pork. Smithfieldís market power grab is a far
greater problem in live hog market, a perishable commodity, than market
power in a non-perishable market given the same industry concentration
levels. This is because a seller of hogs has to sell within a narrow time
window, otherwise the hogs grow too large, are discounted in price and
cost more in production costs. Hog farmers have to sell even at
ìfire sale prices because they can't hold withhold supply
to force bidders to pay more over time. Whereas a seller of books, for
example, does not have to sell within a narrow window because the books
do not deteriorate. Thus, concentration in the packing industry is a far
greater concern than the same concentration in, for example, the book
publishing and sales industry. Shackle space crisis: There is a substantial
prospect that Smithfield could opt to close on or two of its older Midwest
plants after the Farmland acquisition. Smithfield has a history of buying
plants, closing them down, and guaranteeing that they are never used to
slaughter hogs in the future. The two oldest plants are Smithfield's plants
in Sioux Falls, SD and Sioux City, IA. Farmland's plants are newer. If
one or both of the older plants are closed, the shackle space available
to U.S. hog producers would be severely reduced. The shackle space availability
constitutes the immediate, or direct, demand for live hogs ñ irrespective
of consumer demand for pork. The hog market is extremely sensitive to
changes in shackle space availability. "We can expect the catastrophically
low prices of the Winter of 1998 if this occurs,"said Stumo. Price manipulation/collusion risk: We have
concerns that market prices are not being reported accurately by the dominant
firms through the USDA market price reporting service. In antitrust terms,
we think that there may be some parallel behavior or tacit collusion occurring.
With the removal of Farmland Pork as a competitor in this region, the
ability to engage in outright collusion, or parallel behavior to push
prices artificially lower is a very great concern. "If this acquisition goes through without the Bush Administration and Attorney General John Ashcroft opposing it,"continued Stokes, "farmers and ranchers and rural American can only conclude that the government is for sale to the highest bidder." |
|
|
|
|
|
CCMP is not a membership organization. Funding comes from livestock auction markets and independent feeders on a per-head basis at the point of sale. All contributions are tax deductible under OCMs non-profit status. For more information, contact Steve Cady at 402.792.0041 or visit the web site at www.competitivemarkets.com. The Organization For Competitive Markets is a multidisciplinary, nonprofit group of farmers, ranchers, academics, attorneys, and policy makers dedicated to reclaiming the agricultural marketplace for independent farmers, ranchers and rural communities. |
|
|
|
|
|
Organization For Competitive Markets
P.O. Box 6486 Lincoln, NE 68506 Tel: 662-476-5568 e-mail: ocm@competitivemarkets.com |
|