The most significant economic development of the last thirty years has been the trend known as
globalization. It is characterized by the removal of national barriers to the movement of goods and capital within a worldwide financial system. The result has been the transfer of economic activity to countries of “lowest cost” in terms of wages, work practices and environmental impact
Globalization has been “sold” to all concerned on the ground of economic efficiency. The free movement of goods, technology and money was to result in the maximum production at the lowest price, ushering an era of global prosperity. It seemed to be so during the last decades of the 20th century, but after 2000 warning signs began appearing, and in 2006/2007 the “financial crisis” struck.
Five years later, despite huge government deficits and continuous money printing by the Federal Reserve, we are still stuck in a “fragile”, low-growth economy. Jobs are scarce, and those that have been “created” since the crash are mostly of the low-pay, no-benefits, part-time variety. Workforce participation is at a 30-year low, and a large part of the population subsists on various forms of welfare. The (official) unemployment rate is dropping only because discouraged workers are no longer counted in official statistics.
So, was globalization a defective product sold through deceptive advertising?
To understand one must look at the typical case: a U.S. plant when production is shifted to a “low-cost” country.
Such factories used to pay high wages, which were spent or invested in the local area. The plant supported suppliers, supermarkets, schools, shops, clinics, lawyers and other professionals. Their income in turn was invested in inventories, buildings and real estate, creating valuable assets.
When the plant closes incomes vanish and assets lose much of their value. Shops close, home prices drop, high-income jobs move away. A thriving economic ecology becomes a dead zone.
Income and assets are not simply transferred somewhere else. They actually disappear: the plant built in the “low-cost” country is worth less: less safety features, simpler amenities, little or no environmental protection. Lower wages mean that the surrounding economic zone will be smaller and poorer.
This script, repeated thousands of times in various forms, makes the U.S. – and the world – poorer.
True, we are now importing a lower-priced product, but the income of the laid-off workers has dropped even more, so the lower price is a fictitious benefit. The net result of the transaction is a loss. The “low-cost” country (for instance China) has grown richer. The “high-cost” country (the U.S.) has become poorer. But the Chinese gain is smaller than the American loss. Wealth has been sucked into a black hole and disappeared.
The corporation owning the plant and transferring production has, for a limited time, increased its profits. It has also destroyed part of its domestic market. If many corporations follow that route the market for the product will disappear. What is left is a low-income, high unemployment population, increasingly dependent on welfare. This is the situation towards which the U.S. is now heading.
The loss of income and assets has further consequences:
Credit loss - Assets and or income are collateral for credit. When they vanish credit dries up, and so does purchasing power. In a consumer economy this means regression or stagnation.
Investment shortage - Investment capital goes preferentially to the “low-cost” areas, domestic investment is assumed to be non-competitive. Corporations and banks stop lending and sit on mountains of unproductive cash.
Concentration, cartels and monopolies - Large multi-nationals have an inherent advantage in the new environment. Smaller corporations fail or are absorbed, until three or four giants dominate each industry.
Finally there is the corrosive effect of massive and sudden wealth, including corruption at all levels; the blending of interests between large businesses and government; the uncontrollable growth of welfare with the resulting deficits; and the loss of national sovereignty in an environment where the main players are unaccountable.
As international institutions now recognize, the global economy is heading towards ever slower growth. The glow of globalization is fast fading. A different approach – one that will restore the country’s growth prospects – is urgently needed.
As the political battle over the Affordable Care Act grows in scope and intensity we should step back and take a fresh look at the issue: what kind of health care do we want, and how do we get there. The Affordable Care Act – “Obamacare” – is presented as a step towards a uniform health care system, serving all citizens under the same conditions of price and quality. A…Read more...
The federal budget is out of control and neither party seems willing or able to do something about it. Nevertheless something needs to be done before the current course – endless borrowing while the Federal Reserve prints money indefinitely – results in a dollar panic, runaway inflation and the collapse of U.S. credit. There is a way out of the current predicament. The present situation has two main drivers. Ideological…Read more...
If government by consensus is “the American way” – and it is – why is there so little of it today? There are two main reasons: The first is ideology, a political disease inherited from the last century. Ideology is a man-made worldview within which all questions are answered up front. It demands total assent and obedience. In the ideological universe any doubt, question or dissent is at best a…Read more...
The First Amendment to the Constitution forbids “the establishment of religion”. Such “establishment” was common in 18th century Europe. The “established” faith was the one the sovereign had chosen, and was therefore favored and supported by the state. Other religions or denominations were, at worst, severely persecuted; and, at best, given second class status. In return for state support and protection, the hierarchy and members of the established faith…Read more...
No one knows why James Hunter left his family for a two year gold prospecting tour in them thar hills. All we really know is a remote branch of the family tree once broke loose from his Missouri roots for the California Gold Rush. Maybe James wanted respite from routine … or plain old adventure. Or maybe he had gold fever. He found gold, probably not the bonanza he wanted,…Read more...
BY LINA KHAN In July, the public learned that Goldman Sachs and several other large banks have morphed into giant merchants of physical goods, routinely shipping oil, running power plants, and amassing stocks of metals so large that Coca Cola accused them of hoarding. It was a disconcerting moment, as regulators realized that firms so recently known for their explosive mortgage-backed securities also deal in goods that can literally explode….Read more...
American agriculture is the most efficient and productive on the planet. Between 2% and 4% of the population – depending whether one counts migrant workers or not – raises enough to keep us well fed, with plenty left for export. This achievement has a dark side. Not only are ranchers and farmers a small fraction of the American population, but the number is shrinking: the average farmer (or rancher) is…Read more...